Correlation Between Sterling Capital and Mfs Emerging
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Sterling Capital and Mfs Emerging at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Sterling Capital and Mfs Emerging into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Sterling Capital Short and Mfs Emerging Markets, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Sterling Capital and Mfs Emerging and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Sterling Capital with a short position of Mfs Emerging. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Sterling Capital and Mfs Emerging.
Diversification Opportunities for Sterling Capital and Mfs Emerging
0.67 | Correlation Coefficient |
Poor diversification
The 3 months correlation between STERLING and Mfs is 0.67. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Sterling Capital Short and Mfs Emerging Markets in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Mfs Emerging Markets and Sterling Capital is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Sterling Capital Short are associated (or correlated) with Mfs Emerging. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Mfs Emerging Markets has no effect on the direction of Sterling Capital i.e., Sterling Capital and Mfs Emerging go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Sterling Capital and Mfs Emerging
Assuming the 90 days horizon Sterling Capital is expected to generate 5.93 times less return on investment than Mfs Emerging. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Sterling Capital Short is 2.77 times less risky than Mfs Emerging. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Mfs Emerging Markets is currently generating about 0.13 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 1,213 in Mfs Emerging Markets on September 4, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 9.00 from holding Mfs Emerging Markets or generate 0.74% return on investment over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Moves Together |
| Strength | Significant |
| Accuracy | 95.24% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
Sterling Capital Short vs. Mfs Emerging Markets
Performance |
| Timeline |
| Sterling Capital Short |
| Mfs Emerging Markets |
Sterling Capital and Mfs Emerging Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with Sterling Capital and Mfs Emerging
The main advantage of trading using opposite Sterling Capital and Mfs Emerging positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Sterling Capital position performs unexpectedly, Mfs Emerging can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Mfs Emerging will offset losses from the drop in Mfs Emerging's long position.| Sterling Capital vs. Sterling Capital Behavioral | Sterling Capital vs. Sterling Capital Behavioral | Sterling Capital vs. Sterling Capital Behavioral | Sterling Capital vs. Sterling Capital South |
| Mfs Emerging vs. Mfs Prudent Investor | Mfs Emerging vs. Mfs Prudent Investor | Mfs Emerging vs. Mfs Prudent Investor | Mfs Emerging vs. Mfs Prudent Investor |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Pair Correlation module to compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments.
Other Complementary Tools
| Portfolio Manager State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital | |
| Watchlist Optimization Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm | |
| Portfolio Backtesting Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios | |
| Portfolio Diagnostics Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings | |
| My Watchlist Analysis Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like |