Correlation Between California High-yield and Oppenheimer Global

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both California High-yield and Oppenheimer Global at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining California High-yield and Oppenheimer Global into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between California High Yield Municipal and Oppenheimer Global Multi Asset, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on California High-yield and Oppenheimer Global and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in California High-yield with a short position of Oppenheimer Global. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of California High-yield and Oppenheimer Global.

Diversification Opportunities for California High-yield and Oppenheimer Global

0.24
  Correlation Coefficient

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between California and Oppenheimer is 0.24. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding California High Yield Municipa and Oppenheimer Global Multi Asset in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Oppenheimer Global and California High-yield is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on California High Yield Municipal are associated (or correlated) with Oppenheimer Global. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Oppenheimer Global has no effect on the direction of California High-yield i.e., California High-yield and Oppenheimer Global go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between California High-yield and Oppenheimer Global

Assuming the 90 days horizon California High Yield Municipal is expected to generate 0.44 times more return on investment than Oppenheimer Global. However, California High Yield Municipal is 2.27 times less risky than Oppenheimer Global. It trades about 0.19 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Oppenheimer Global Multi Asset is currently generating about -0.03 per unit of risk. If you would invest  982.00  in California High Yield Municipal on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  13.00  from holding California High Yield Municipal or generate 1.32% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy95.45%
ValuesDaily Returns

California High Yield Municipa  vs.  Oppenheimer Global Multi Asset

 Performance 
       Timeline  
California High Yield 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in California High Yield Municipal are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, California High-yield is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Oppenheimer Global 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Oppenheimer Global Multi Asset has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Oppenheimer Global is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

California High-yield and Oppenheimer Global Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with California High-yield and Oppenheimer Global

The main advantage of trading using opposite California High-yield and Oppenheimer Global positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if California High-yield position performs unexpectedly, Oppenheimer Global can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Oppenheimer Global will offset losses from the drop in Oppenheimer Global's long position.
The idea behind California High Yield Municipal and Oppenheimer Global Multi Asset pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Volatility Analysis module to get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data.

Other Complementary Tools

Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance