Correlation Between BG Staffing and Issuer Direct

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both BG Staffing and Issuer Direct at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining BG Staffing and Issuer Direct into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between BG Staffing and Issuer Direct Corp, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on BG Staffing and Issuer Direct and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in BG Staffing with a short position of Issuer Direct. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of BG Staffing and Issuer Direct.

Diversification Opportunities for BG Staffing and Issuer Direct

0.65
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between BGSF and Issuer is 0.65. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding BG Staffing and Issuer Direct Corp in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Issuer Direct Corp and BG Staffing is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on BG Staffing are associated (or correlated) with Issuer Direct. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Issuer Direct Corp has no effect on the direction of BG Staffing i.e., BG Staffing and Issuer Direct go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between BG Staffing and Issuer Direct

Given the investment horizon of 90 days BG Staffing is expected to generate 0.88 times more return on investment than Issuer Direct. However, BG Staffing is 1.13 times less risky than Issuer Direct. It trades about -0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Issuer Direct Corp is currently generating about -0.04 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,136  in BG Staffing on November 1, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (608.00) from holding BG Staffing or give up 53.52% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy99.37%
ValuesDaily Returns

BG Staffing  vs.  Issuer Direct Corp

 Performance 
       Timeline  
BG Staffing 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days BG Staffing has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite weak performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain nearly stable which may send shares a bit higher in March 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long-run up-swing for the company stockholders.
Issuer Direct Corp 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Issuer Direct Corp has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Even with relatively invariable fundamental indicators, Issuer Direct is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price agitation, may contribute to short-term losses for the retail investors.

BG Staffing and Issuer Direct Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with BG Staffing and Issuer Direct

The main advantage of trading using opposite BG Staffing and Issuer Direct positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if BG Staffing position performs unexpectedly, Issuer Direct can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Issuer Direct will offset losses from the drop in Issuer Direct's long position.
The idea behind BG Staffing and Issuer Direct Corp pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Companies Directory module to evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals.

Other Complementary Tools

ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance