Correlation Between Bank of New York and Zalemark Holding

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of New York and Zalemark Holding at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of New York and Zalemark Holding into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of New and Zalemark Holding Co, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of New York and Zalemark Holding and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of New York with a short position of Zalemark Holding. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of New York and Zalemark Holding.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of New York and Zalemark Holding

-0.29
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and Zalemark is -0.29. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of New and Zalemark Holding Co in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Zalemark Holding and Bank of New York is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of New are associated (or correlated) with Zalemark Holding. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Zalemark Holding has no effect on the direction of Bank of New York i.e., Bank of New York and Zalemark Holding go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of New York and Zalemark Holding

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Bank of New York is expected to generate 2.35 times less return on investment than Zalemark Holding. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Bank of New is 11.23 times less risky than Zalemark Holding. It trades about 0.27 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Zalemark Holding Co is currently generating about 0.06 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  0.05  in Zalemark Holding Co on August 30, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  0.00  from holding Zalemark Holding Co or generate 0.0% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy95.65%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bank of New  vs.  Zalemark Holding Co

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bank of New York 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

21 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bank of New are ranked lower than 21 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite quite uncertain forward-looking signals, Bank of New York disclosed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Zalemark Holding 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Zalemark Holding Co are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite quite uncertain basic indicators, Zalemark Holding disclosed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Bank of New York and Zalemark Holding Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bank of New York and Zalemark Holding

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of New York and Zalemark Holding positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of New York position performs unexpectedly, Zalemark Holding can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Zalemark Holding will offset losses from the drop in Zalemark Holding's long position.
The idea behind Bank of New and Zalemark Holding Co pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Positions Ratings module to determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Anywhere
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Sync Your Broker
Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors.
Share Portfolio
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance