Correlation Between Bloomin Brands and Restaurant Brands

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bloomin Brands and Restaurant Brands at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bloomin Brands and Restaurant Brands into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bloomin Brands and Restaurant Brands International, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bloomin Brands and Restaurant Brands and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bloomin Brands with a short position of Restaurant Brands. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bloomin Brands and Restaurant Brands.

Diversification Opportunities for Bloomin Brands and Restaurant Brands

0.16
  Correlation Coefficient

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bloomin and Restaurant is 0.16. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bloomin Brands and Restaurant Brands Internationa in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Restaurant Brands and Bloomin Brands is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bloomin Brands are associated (or correlated) with Restaurant Brands. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Restaurant Brands has no effect on the direction of Bloomin Brands i.e., Bloomin Brands and Restaurant Brands go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bloomin Brands and Restaurant Brands

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Bloomin Brands is expected to under-perform the Restaurant Brands. In addition to that, Bloomin Brands is 4.23 times more volatile than Restaurant Brands International. It trades about -0.16 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Restaurant Brands International is currently generating about -0.08 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  7,110  in Restaurant Brands International on August 27, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (129.00) from holding Restaurant Brands International or give up 1.81% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bloomin Brands  vs.  Restaurant Brands Internationa

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bloomin Brands 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Bloomin Brands has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of unfluctuating performance in the last few months, the Stock's primary indicators remain very healthy which may send shares a bit higher in December 2024. The recent disarray may also be a sign of long period up-swing for the firm investors.
Restaurant Brands 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Restaurant Brands International are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Even with relatively invariable basic indicators, Restaurant Brands is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price agitation, may contribute to short-term losses for the retail investors.

Bloomin Brands and Restaurant Brands Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bloomin Brands and Restaurant Brands

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bloomin Brands and Restaurant Brands positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bloomin Brands position performs unexpectedly, Restaurant Brands can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Restaurant Brands will offset losses from the drop in Restaurant Brands' long position.
The idea behind Bloomin Brands and Restaurant Brands International pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Investing Opportunities module to build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences.

Other Complementary Tools

My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities