Correlation Between Benchmark Electronics and Scientific Games

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Benchmark Electronics and Scientific Games at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Benchmark Electronics and Scientific Games into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Benchmark Electronics and Scientific Games, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Benchmark Electronics and Scientific Games and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Benchmark Electronics with a short position of Scientific Games. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Benchmark Electronics and Scientific Games.

Diversification Opportunities for Benchmark Electronics and Scientific Games

-0.21
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Benchmark and Scientific is -0.21. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Benchmark Electronics and Scientific Games in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Scientific Games and Benchmark Electronics is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Benchmark Electronics are associated (or correlated) with Scientific Games. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Scientific Games has no effect on the direction of Benchmark Electronics i.e., Benchmark Electronics and Scientific Games go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Benchmark Electronics and Scientific Games

Assuming the 90 days horizon Benchmark Electronics is expected to generate 1.06 times more return on investment than Scientific Games. However, Benchmark Electronics is 1.06 times more volatile than Scientific Games. It trades about 0.13 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Scientific Games is currently generating about 0.04 per unit of risk. If you would invest  4,120  in Benchmark Electronics on August 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  360.00  from holding Benchmark Electronics or generate 8.74% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Benchmark Electronics  vs.  Scientific Games

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Benchmark Electronics 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Benchmark Electronics are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, Benchmark Electronics reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Scientific Games 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Scientific Games has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Scientific Games is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Benchmark Electronics and Scientific Games Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Benchmark Electronics and Scientific Games

The main advantage of trading using opposite Benchmark Electronics and Scientific Games positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Benchmark Electronics position performs unexpectedly, Scientific Games can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Scientific Games will offset losses from the drop in Scientific Games' long position.
The idea behind Benchmark Electronics and Scientific Games pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Comparator module to compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account.

Other Complementary Tools

Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios