Correlation Between Bank of America and Total Energy

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of America and Total Energy at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of America and Total Energy into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of America and Total Energy Services, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and Total Energy and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of Total Energy. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and Total Energy.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and Total Energy

0.93
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and Total is 0.93. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of America and Total Energy Services in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Total Energy Services and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of America are associated (or correlated) with Total Energy. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Total Energy Services has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and Total Energy go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of America and Total Energy

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Bank of America is expected to generate 1.43 times less return on investment than Total Energy. In addition to that, Bank of America is 1.28 times more volatile than Total Energy Services. It trades about 0.31 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Total Energy Services is currently generating about 0.57 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  962.00  in Total Energy Services on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  206.00  from holding Total Energy Services or generate 21.41% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bank of America  vs.  Total Energy Services

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bank of America 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

13 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bank of America are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather weak technical and fundamental indicators, Bank of America exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Total Energy Services 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

19 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Total Energy Services are ranked lower than 19 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very unfluctuating basic indicators, Total Energy displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Bank of America and Total Energy Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bank of America and Total Energy

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and Total Energy positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, Total Energy can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Total Energy will offset losses from the drop in Total Energy's long position.
The idea behind Bank of America and Total Energy Services pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Positions Ratings module to determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities
Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios