Correlation Between Berkshire Hathaway and Everest Group

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Berkshire Hathaway and Everest Group at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Berkshire Hathaway and Everest Group into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Berkshire Hathaway and Everest Group, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Berkshire Hathaway and Everest Group and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Berkshire Hathaway with a short position of Everest Group. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Berkshire Hathaway and Everest Group.

Diversification Opportunities for Berkshire Hathaway and Everest Group

-0.56
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Berkshire and Everest is -0.56. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Berkshire Hathaway and Everest Group in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Everest Group and Berkshire Hathaway is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Berkshire Hathaway are associated (or correlated) with Everest Group. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Everest Group has no effect on the direction of Berkshire Hathaway i.e., Berkshire Hathaway and Everest Group go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Berkshire Hathaway and Everest Group

Assuming the 90 days horizon Berkshire Hathaway is expected to generate 100.23 times more return on investment than Everest Group. However, Berkshire Hathaway is 100.23 times more volatile than Everest Group. It trades about 0.14 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Everest Group is currently generating about -0.07 per unit of risk. If you would invest  63,900,000  in Berkshire Hathaway on September 23, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  850,000  from holding Berkshire Hathaway or generate 1.33% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Berkshire Hathaway  vs.  Everest Group

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Berkshire Hathaway 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Berkshire Hathaway are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, Berkshire Hathaway reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Everest Group 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Everest Group has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Everest Group is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Berkshire Hathaway and Everest Group Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Berkshire Hathaway and Everest Group

The main advantage of trading using opposite Berkshire Hathaway and Everest Group positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Berkshire Hathaway position performs unexpectedly, Everest Group can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Everest Group will offset losses from the drop in Everest Group's long position.
The idea behind Berkshire Hathaway and Everest Group pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Share Portfolio module to track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Cryptocurrency Center
Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency
Stock Tickers
Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing