Correlation Between BT Brands and Restaurant Brands

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both BT Brands and Restaurant Brands at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining BT Brands and Restaurant Brands into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between BT Brands Warrant and Restaurant Brands International, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on BT Brands and Restaurant Brands and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in BT Brands with a short position of Restaurant Brands. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of BT Brands and Restaurant Brands.

Diversification Opportunities for BT Brands and Restaurant Brands

-0.4
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between BTBDW and Restaurant is -0.4. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding BT Brands Warrant and Restaurant Brands Internationa in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Restaurant Brands and BT Brands is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on BT Brands Warrant are associated (or correlated) with Restaurant Brands. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Restaurant Brands has no effect on the direction of BT Brands i.e., BT Brands and Restaurant Brands go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between BT Brands and Restaurant Brands

Assuming the 90 days horizon BT Brands Warrant is expected to generate 178.39 times more return on investment than Restaurant Brands. However, BT Brands is 178.39 times more volatile than Restaurant Brands International. It trades about 0.24 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Restaurant Brands International is currently generating about 0.04 per unit of risk. If you would invest  11.00  in BT Brands Warrant on August 24, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (1.56) from holding BT Brands Warrant or give up 14.18% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy49.6%
ValuesDaily Returns

BT Brands Warrant  vs.  Restaurant Brands Internationa

 Performance 
       Timeline  
BT Brands Warrant 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Over the last 90 days BT Brands Warrant has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of fairly unfluctuating fundamental indicators, BT Brands showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Restaurant Brands 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Restaurant Brands International are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Even with relatively invariable basic indicators, Restaurant Brands is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price agitation, may contribute to short-term losses for the retail investors.

BT Brands and Restaurant Brands Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with BT Brands and Restaurant Brands

The main advantage of trading using opposite BT Brands and Restaurant Brands positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if BT Brands position performs unexpectedly, Restaurant Brands can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Restaurant Brands will offset losses from the drop in Restaurant Brands' long position.
The idea behind BT Brands Warrant and Restaurant Brands International pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Competition Analyzer module to analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities.

Other Complementary Tools

Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum
Bond Analysis
Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios.
Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk