Correlation Between Grayscale Bitcoin and PIMCO Intermediate

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Grayscale Bitcoin and PIMCO Intermediate at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Grayscale Bitcoin and PIMCO Intermediate into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Grayscale Bitcoin Mini and PIMCO Intermediate Municipal, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Grayscale Bitcoin and PIMCO Intermediate and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Grayscale Bitcoin with a short position of PIMCO Intermediate. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Grayscale Bitcoin and PIMCO Intermediate.

Diversification Opportunities for Grayscale Bitcoin and PIMCO Intermediate

-0.51
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Grayscale and PIMCO is -0.51. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Grayscale Bitcoin Mini and PIMCO Intermediate Municipal in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on PIMCO Intermediate and Grayscale Bitcoin is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Grayscale Bitcoin Mini are associated (or correlated) with PIMCO Intermediate. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of PIMCO Intermediate has no effect on the direction of Grayscale Bitcoin i.e., Grayscale Bitcoin and PIMCO Intermediate go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Grayscale Bitcoin and PIMCO Intermediate

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Grayscale Bitcoin Mini is expected to generate 12.5 times more return on investment than PIMCO Intermediate. However, Grayscale Bitcoin is 12.5 times more volatile than PIMCO Intermediate Municipal. It trades about 0.38 of its potential returns per unit of risk. PIMCO Intermediate Municipal is currently generating about 0.12 per unit of risk. If you would invest  3,085  in Grayscale Bitcoin Mini on August 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,131  from holding Grayscale Bitcoin Mini or generate 36.66% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Grayscale Bitcoin Mini  vs.  PIMCO Intermediate Municipal

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Grayscale Bitcoin Mini 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

19 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Grayscale Bitcoin Mini are ranked lower than 19 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather inconsistent basic indicators, Grayscale Bitcoin exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
PIMCO Intermediate 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in PIMCO Intermediate Municipal are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite fairly strong basic indicators, PIMCO Intermediate is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price confusion, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the traders.

Grayscale Bitcoin and PIMCO Intermediate Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Grayscale Bitcoin and PIMCO Intermediate

The main advantage of trading using opposite Grayscale Bitcoin and PIMCO Intermediate positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Grayscale Bitcoin position performs unexpectedly, PIMCO Intermediate can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in PIMCO Intermediate will offset losses from the drop in PIMCO Intermediate's long position.
The idea behind Grayscale Bitcoin Mini and PIMCO Intermediate Municipal pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Stock Screener module to find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook..

Other Complementary Tools

Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets