Correlation Between Boston Properties and Interactive Strength

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Boston Properties and Interactive Strength at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Boston Properties and Interactive Strength into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Boston Properties and Interactive Strength Common, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Boston Properties and Interactive Strength and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Boston Properties with a short position of Interactive Strength. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Boston Properties and Interactive Strength.

Diversification Opportunities for Boston Properties and Interactive Strength

-0.6
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Boston and Interactive is -0.6. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Boston Properties and Interactive Strength Common in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Interactive Strength and Boston Properties is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Boston Properties are associated (or correlated) with Interactive Strength. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Interactive Strength has no effect on the direction of Boston Properties i.e., Boston Properties and Interactive Strength go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Boston Properties and Interactive Strength

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Boston Properties is expected to generate 0.21 times more return on investment than Interactive Strength. However, Boston Properties is 4.79 times less risky than Interactive Strength. It trades about 0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Interactive Strength Common is currently generating about -0.16 per unit of risk. If you would invest  4,958  in Boston Properties on September 4, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  3,130  from holding Boston Properties or generate 63.13% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Boston Properties  vs.  Interactive Strength Common

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Boston Properties 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Boston Properties are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Even with relatively fragile basic indicators, Boston Properties may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Interactive Strength 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Interactive Strength Common has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Even with unfluctuating performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain relatively invariable which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The latest agitation may also be a sign of long-running up-swing for the enterprise retail investors.

Boston Properties and Interactive Strength Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Boston Properties and Interactive Strength

The main advantage of trading using opposite Boston Properties and Interactive Strength positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Boston Properties position performs unexpectedly, Interactive Strength can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Interactive Strength will offset losses from the drop in Interactive Strength's long position.
The idea behind Boston Properties and Interactive Strength Common pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Positions Ratings module to determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Bollinger Bands
Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon
Commodity Directory
Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges
USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA