Correlation Between Boyd Gaming and Procter Gamble

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Boyd Gaming and Procter Gamble at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Boyd Gaming and Procter Gamble into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Boyd Gaming and Procter Gamble, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Boyd Gaming and Procter Gamble and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Boyd Gaming with a short position of Procter Gamble. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Boyd Gaming and Procter Gamble.

Diversification Opportunities for Boyd Gaming and Procter Gamble

-0.43
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Boyd and Procter is -0.43. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Boyd Gaming and Procter Gamble in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Procter Gamble and Boyd Gaming is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Boyd Gaming are associated (or correlated) with Procter Gamble. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Procter Gamble has no effect on the direction of Boyd Gaming i.e., Boyd Gaming and Procter Gamble go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Boyd Gaming and Procter Gamble

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Boyd Gaming is expected to generate 2.08 times more return on investment than Procter Gamble. However, Boyd Gaming is 2.08 times more volatile than Procter Gamble. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Procter Gamble is currently generating about 0.08 per unit of risk. If you would invest  6,294  in Boyd Gaming on August 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,005  from holding Boyd Gaming or generate 15.97% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Boyd Gaming  vs.  Procter Gamble

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Boyd Gaming 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

16 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Boyd Gaming are ranked lower than 16 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unfluctuating basic indicators, Boyd Gaming exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Procter Gamble 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Procter Gamble are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Boyd Gaming and Procter Gamble Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Boyd Gaming and Procter Gamble

The main advantage of trading using opposite Boyd Gaming and Procter Gamble positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Boyd Gaming position performs unexpectedly, Procter Gamble can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Procter Gamble will offset losses from the drop in Procter Gamble's long position.
The idea behind Boyd Gaming and Procter Gamble pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Analyzer module to portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine.

Other Complementary Tools

Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements
Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules