Correlation Between Citigroup and Qingdao NovelBeam

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Citigroup and Qingdao NovelBeam at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Citigroup and Qingdao NovelBeam into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and Qingdao NovelBeam Technology, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and Qingdao NovelBeam and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of Qingdao NovelBeam. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and Qingdao NovelBeam.

Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and Qingdao NovelBeam

0.72
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and Qingdao is 0.72. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and Qingdao NovelBeam Technology in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Qingdao NovelBeam and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with Qingdao NovelBeam. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Qingdao NovelBeam has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and Qingdao NovelBeam go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Citigroup and Qingdao NovelBeam

Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Citigroup is expected to generate 0.78 times more return on investment than Qingdao NovelBeam. However, Citigroup is 1.29 times less risky than Qingdao NovelBeam. It trades about -0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Qingdao NovelBeam Technology is currently generating about -0.49 per unit of risk. If you would invest  8,051  in Citigroup on November 27, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (86.00) from holding Citigroup or give up 1.07% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy75.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Citigroup  vs.  Qingdao NovelBeam Technology

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Citigroup 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OK

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Citigroup are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unfluctuating fundamental indicators, Citigroup exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Qingdao NovelBeam 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Qingdao NovelBeam Technology are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Qingdao NovelBeam is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Citigroup and Qingdao NovelBeam Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Citigroup and Qingdao NovelBeam

The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and Qingdao NovelBeam positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, Qingdao NovelBeam can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Qingdao NovelBeam will offset losses from the drop in Qingdao NovelBeam's long position.
The idea behind Citigroup and Qingdao NovelBeam Technology pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Earnings Calls module to check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges.

Other Complementary Tools

Balance Of Power
Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios
Sync Your Broker
Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors.
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes