Correlation Between Citigroup and Aspen Insurance

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Citigroup and Aspen Insurance at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Citigroup and Aspen Insurance into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and Aspen Insurance Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and Aspen Insurance and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of Aspen Insurance. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and Aspen Insurance.

Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and Aspen Insurance

0.14
  Correlation Coefficient

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and Aspen is 0.14. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and Aspen Insurance Holdings in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Aspen Insurance Holdings and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with Aspen Insurance. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Aspen Insurance Holdings has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and Aspen Insurance go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Citigroup and Aspen Insurance

Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Citigroup is expected to generate 3.24 times more return on investment than Aspen Insurance. However, Citigroup is 3.24 times more volatile than Aspen Insurance Holdings. It trades about 0.25 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Aspen Insurance Holdings is currently generating about -0.22 per unit of risk. If you would invest  6,360  in Citigroup on August 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  715.00  from holding Citigroup or generate 11.24% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy95.45%
ValuesDaily Returns

Citigroup  vs.  Aspen Insurance Holdings

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Citigroup 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Citigroup are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather uncertain fundamental indicators, Citigroup exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Aspen Insurance Holdings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Aspen Insurance Holdings has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of rather sound essential indicators, Aspen Insurance is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.

Citigroup and Aspen Insurance Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Citigroup and Aspen Insurance

The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and Aspen Insurance positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, Aspen Insurance can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Aspen Insurance will offset losses from the drop in Aspen Insurance's long position.
The idea behind Citigroup and Aspen Insurance Holdings pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Top Crypto Exchanges module to search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges.

Other Complementary Tools

Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk