Correlation Between Citigroup and CHEROKEE
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Citigroup and CHEROKEE at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Citigroup and CHEROKEE into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and CHEROKEE, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and CHEROKEE and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of CHEROKEE. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and CHEROKEE.
Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and CHEROKEE
Pay attention - limited upside
The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and CHEROKEE is 0.0. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and CHEROKEE in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on CHEROKEE and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with CHEROKEE. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of CHEROKEE has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and CHEROKEE go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Citigroup and CHEROKEE
If you would invest 6,361 in Citigroup on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 726.00 from holding Citigroup or generate 11.41% return on investment over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Flat |
| Strength | Insignificant |
| Accuracy | 0.0% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
Citigroup vs. CHEROKEE
Performance |
| Timeline |
| Citigroup |
| CHEROKEE |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
0 of 100
Weak | Strong |
Very Weak
Citigroup and CHEROKEE Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with Citigroup and CHEROKEE
The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and CHEROKEE positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, CHEROKEE can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in CHEROKEE will offset losses from the drop in CHEROKEE's long position.| Citigroup vs. JPMorgan Chase Co | Citigroup vs. Wells Fargo | Citigroup vs. Toronto Dominion Bank | Citigroup vs. Nu Holdings |
| CHEROKEE vs. Vastned Retail NV | CHEROKEE vs. UMC Electronics Co | CHEROKEE vs. Tradeweb Markets | CHEROKEE vs. RETAIL FOOD GROUP |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Options Analysis module to analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios.
Other Complementary Tools
| Piotroski F Score Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals | |
| Portfolio Comparator Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account | |
| Competition Analyzer Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities | |
| Idea Analyzer Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas | |
| Performance Analysis Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation |