Correlation Between Citigroup and Mfs Emerging
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Citigroup and Mfs Emerging at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Citigroup and Mfs Emerging into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and Mfs Emerging Markets, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and Mfs Emerging and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of Mfs Emerging. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and Mfs Emerging.
Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and Mfs Emerging
-0.71 | Correlation Coefficient |
Pay attention - limited upside
The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and Mfs is -0.71. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and Mfs Emerging Markets in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Mfs Emerging Markets and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with Mfs Emerging. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Mfs Emerging Markets has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and Mfs Emerging go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Citigroup and Mfs Emerging
Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Citigroup is expected to generate 4.29 times more return on investment than Mfs Emerging. However, Citigroup is 4.29 times more volatile than Mfs Emerging Markets. It trades about 0.22 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Mfs Emerging Markets is currently generating about -0.12 per unit of risk. If you would invest 6,360 in Citigroup on August 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 656.00 from holding Citigroup or generate 10.31% return on investment over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Moves Against |
| Strength | Weak |
| Accuracy | 100.0% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
Citigroup vs. Mfs Emerging Markets
Performance |
| Timeline |
| Citigroup |
| Mfs Emerging Markets |
Citigroup and Mfs Emerging Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with Citigroup and Mfs Emerging
The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and Mfs Emerging positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, Mfs Emerging can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Mfs Emerging will offset losses from the drop in Mfs Emerging's long position.| Citigroup vs. JPMorgan Chase Co | Citigroup vs. Wells Fargo | Citigroup vs. Toronto Dominion Bank | Citigroup vs. Nu Holdings |
| Mfs Emerging vs. Abr 7525 Volatility | Mfs Emerging vs. Scharf Global Opportunity | Mfs Emerging vs. Volumetric Fund Volumetric | Mfs Emerging vs. Qs Large Cap |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Insider Screener module to find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance.
Other Complementary Tools
| AI Portfolio Architect Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities | |
| Theme Ratings Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
| Correlation Analysis Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated | |
| Portfolio Backtesting Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios | |
| Piotroski F Score Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals |