Correlation Between Citigroup and FAT Brands
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Citigroup and FAT Brands at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Citigroup and FAT Brands into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and FAT Brands, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and FAT Brands and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of FAT Brands. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and FAT Brands.
Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and FAT Brands
0.79 | Correlation Coefficient |
Poor diversification
The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and FAT is 0.79. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and FAT Brands in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on FAT Brands and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with FAT Brands. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of FAT Brands has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and FAT Brands go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Citigroup and FAT Brands
Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Citigroup is expected to generate 0.83 times more return on investment than FAT Brands. However, Citigroup is 1.21 times less risky than FAT Brands. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. FAT Brands is currently generating about 0.01 per unit of risk. If you would invest 5,992 in Citigroup on September 2, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 1,095 from holding Citigroup or generate 18.27% return on investment over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Moves Together |
| Strength | Significant |
| Accuracy | 100.0% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
Citigroup vs. FAT Brands
Performance |
| Timeline |
| Citigroup |
| FAT Brands |
Citigroup and FAT Brands Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with Citigroup and FAT Brands
The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and FAT Brands positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, FAT Brands can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in FAT Brands will offset losses from the drop in FAT Brands' long position.| Citigroup vs. JPMorgan Chase Co | Citigroup vs. Wells Fargo | Citigroup vs. Toronto Dominion Bank | Citigroup vs. Nu Holdings |
| FAT Brands vs. FAT Brands | FAT Brands vs. Cannae Holdings | FAT Brands vs. Nathans Famous | FAT Brands vs. Dine Brands Global |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Risk-Return Analysis module to view associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume.
Other Complementary Tools
| Pattern Recognition Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges | |
| Bond Analysis Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios. | |
| Price Transformation Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets | |
| ETFs Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world | |
| Theme Ratings Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance |