Correlation Between Citigroup and Marblegate Acquisition

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Citigroup and Marblegate Acquisition at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Citigroup and Marblegate Acquisition into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and Marblegate Acquisition Corp, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and Marblegate Acquisition and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of Marblegate Acquisition. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and Marblegate Acquisition.

Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and Marblegate Acquisition

0.02
  Correlation Coefficient

Significant diversification

The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and Marblegate is 0.02. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and Marblegate Acquisition Corp in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Marblegate Acquisition and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with Marblegate Acquisition. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Marblegate Acquisition has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and Marblegate Acquisition go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Citigroup and Marblegate Acquisition

Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Citigroup is expected to generate 13.03 times less return on investment than Marblegate Acquisition. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Citigroup is 13.96 times less risky than Marblegate Acquisition. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Marblegate Acquisition Corp is currently generating about 0.08 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  3.80  in Marblegate Acquisition Corp on August 30, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (0.60) from holding Marblegate Acquisition Corp or give up 15.79% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Citigroup  vs.  Marblegate Acquisition Corp

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Citigroup 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Citigroup are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unfluctuating fundamental indicators, Citigroup exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Marblegate Acquisition 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Marblegate Acquisition Corp are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly abnormal technical and fundamental indicators, Marblegate Acquisition may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.

Citigroup and Marblegate Acquisition Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Citigroup and Marblegate Acquisition

The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and Marblegate Acquisition positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, Marblegate Acquisition can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Marblegate Acquisition will offset losses from the drop in Marblegate Acquisition's long position.
The idea behind Citigroup and Marblegate Acquisition Corp pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Volatility module to check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk.

Other Complementary Tools

Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences
ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
Aroon Oscillator
Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets