Correlation Between Citigroup and Goldman Sachs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Citigroup and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Citigroup and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and Goldman Sachs

-0.79
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and Goldman is -0.79. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Citigroup and Goldman Sachs

Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Citigroup is expected to generate 1.93 times more return on investment than Goldman Sachs. However, Citigroup is 1.93 times more volatile than Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta. It trades about 0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta is currently generating about 0.05 per unit of risk. If you would invest  4,293  in Citigroup on September 3, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  2,794  from holding Citigroup or generate 65.08% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Citigroup  vs.  Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Citigroup 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Citigroup are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unfluctuating fundamental indicators, Citigroup exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of comparatively stable technical and fundamental indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Citigroup and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Citigroup and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.
The idea behind Citigroup and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Odds Of Bankruptcy module to get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years.

Other Complementary Tools

Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments
AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities