Correlation Between Citigroup and Global X
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Citigroup and Global X at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Citigroup and Global X into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and Global X Psychedelic, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and Global X and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of Global X. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and Global X.
Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and Global X
Very good diversification
The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and Global is -0.48. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and Global X Psychedelic in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Global X Psychedelic and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with Global X. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Global X Psychedelic has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and Global X go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Citigroup and Global X
If you would invest 6,315 in Citigroup on September 2, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 772.00 from holding Citigroup or generate 12.22% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Very Weak |
Accuracy | 4.76% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Citigroup vs. Global X Psychedelic
Performance |
Timeline |
Citigroup |
Global X Psychedelic |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
0 of 100
Weak | Strong |
Very Weak
Citigroup and Global X Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Citigroup and Global X
The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and Global X positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, Global X can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Global X will offset losses from the drop in Global X's long position.Citigroup vs. JPMorgan Chase Co | Citigroup vs. Wells Fargo | Citigroup vs. Toronto Dominion Bank | Citigroup vs. Nu Holdings |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Companies Directory module to evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals.
Other Complementary Tools
Price Transformation Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets | |
Portfolio Volatility Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk | |
Price Ceiling Movement Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments | |
Fundamental Analysis View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements | |
Investing Opportunities Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences |