Correlation Between Citigroup and Qs Us

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Citigroup and Qs Us at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Citigroup and Qs Us into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and Qs Small Capitalization, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and Qs Us and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of Qs Us. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and Qs Us.

Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and Qs Us

0.88
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and LMBMX is 0.88. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and Qs Small Capitalization in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Qs Small Capitalization and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with Qs Us. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Qs Small Capitalization has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and Qs Us go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Citigroup and Qs Us

Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Citigroup is expected to under-perform the Qs Us. In addition to that, Citigroup is 1.38 times more volatile than Qs Small Capitalization. It trades about -0.08 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Qs Small Capitalization is currently generating about -0.06 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  1,193  in Qs Small Capitalization on January 12, 2025 and sell it today you would lose (54.00) from holding Qs Small Capitalization or give up 4.53% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Citigroup  vs.  Qs Small Capitalization

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Citigroup 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Citigroup has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of uncertain performance in the last few months, the Stock's fundamental indicators remain rather sound which may send shares a bit higher in May 2025. The latest tumult may also be a sign of longer-term up-swing for the firm shareholders.
Qs Small Capitalization 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Qs Small Capitalization has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of weak performance in the last few months, the Fund's primary indicators remain fairly strong which may send shares a bit higher in May 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long term up-swing for the fund investors.

Citigroup and Qs Us Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Citigroup and Qs Us

The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and Qs Us positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, Qs Us can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Qs Us will offset losses from the drop in Qs Us' long position.
The idea behind Citigroup and Qs Small Capitalization pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Anywhere module to track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device.

Other Complementary Tools

Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity