Correlation Between Citigroup and Phala Network
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Citigroup and Phala Network at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Citigroup and Phala Network into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and Phala Network, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and Phala Network and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of Phala Network. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and Phala Network.
Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and Phala Network
0.56 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very weak diversification
The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and Phala is 0.56. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and Phala Network in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Phala Network and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with Phala Network. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Phala Network has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and Phala Network go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Citigroup and Phala Network
Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Citigroup is expected to generate 7.63 times less return on investment than Phala Network. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Citigroup is 6.95 times less risky than Phala Network. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Phala Network is currently generating about 0.07 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 13.00 in Phala Network on October 11, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 19.00 from holding Phala Network or generate 146.15% return on investment over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Moves Together |
| Strength | Weak |
| Accuracy | 60.0% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
Citigroup vs. Phala Network
Performance |
| Timeline |
| Citigroup |
| Phala Network |
Citigroup and Phala Network Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with Citigroup and Phala Network
The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and Phala Network positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, Phala Network can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Phala Network will offset losses from the drop in Phala Network's long position.| Citigroup vs. JPMorgan Chase Co | Citigroup vs. Wells Fargo | Citigroup vs. Toronto Dominion Bank | Citigroup vs. Nu Holdings |
| Phala Network vs. Fwog | Phala Network vs. Staked Ether | Phala Network vs. EigenLayer | Phala Network vs. EOSDAC |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Stocks Directory module to find actively traded stocks across global markets.
Other Complementary Tools
| Watchlist Optimization Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm | |
| My Watchlist Analysis Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like | |
| Theme Ratings Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
| Portfolio Volatility Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk | |
| Commodity Directory Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges |