Correlation Between Citigroup and Columbia Emerging

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Citigroup and Columbia Emerging at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Citigroup and Columbia Emerging into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and Columbia Emerging Markets, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and Columbia Emerging and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of Columbia Emerging. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and Columbia Emerging.

Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and Columbia Emerging

0.24
  Correlation Coefficient

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and Columbia is 0.24. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and Columbia Emerging Markets in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Columbia Emerging Markets and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with Columbia Emerging. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Columbia Emerging Markets has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and Columbia Emerging go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Citigroup and Columbia Emerging

Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Citigroup is expected to generate 1.76 times more return on investment than Columbia Emerging. However, Citigroup is 1.76 times more volatile than Columbia Emerging Markets. It trades about 0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Columbia Emerging Markets is currently generating about 0.03 per unit of risk. If you would invest  4,134  in Citigroup on August 30, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  2,882  from holding Citigroup or generate 69.71% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Citigroup  vs.  Columbia Emerging Markets

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Citigroup 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Citigroup are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unfluctuating fundamental indicators, Citigroup exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Columbia Emerging Markets 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Columbia Emerging Markets are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong primary indicators, Columbia Emerging is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Citigroup and Columbia Emerging Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Citigroup and Columbia Emerging

The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and Columbia Emerging positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, Columbia Emerging can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Columbia Emerging will offset losses from the drop in Columbia Emerging's long position.
The idea behind Citigroup and Columbia Emerging Markets pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Pair Correlation module to compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data
Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk