Correlation Between Citigroup and 06051GKH1
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and BAC 5624556 04 FEB 28, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and 06051GKH1 and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of 06051GKH1. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and 06051GKH1.
Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and 06051GKH1
Weak diversification
The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and 06051GKH1 is 0.34. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and BAC 5624556 04 FEB 28 in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on BAC 5624556 04 and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with 06051GKH1. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of BAC 5624556 04 has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and 06051GKH1 go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Citigroup and 06051GKH1
Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Citigroup is expected to generate 4.49 times more return on investment than 06051GKH1. However, Citigroup is 4.49 times more volatile than BAC 5624556 04 FEB 28. It trades about 0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. BAC 5624556 04 FEB 28 is currently generating about 0.02 per unit of risk. If you would invest 4,381 in Citigroup on August 31, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 2,706 from holding Citigroup or generate 61.77% return on investment over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Moves Together |
| Strength | Very Weak |
| Accuracy | 94.14% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
Citigroup vs. BAC 5624556 04 FEB 28
Performance |
| Timeline |
| Citigroup |
| BAC 5624556 04 |
Citigroup and 06051GKH1 Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with Citigroup and 06051GKH1
The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and 06051GKH1 positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, 06051GKH1 can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in 06051GKH1 will offset losses from the drop in 06051GKH1's long position.| Citigroup vs. JPMorgan Chase Co | Citigroup vs. Wells Fargo | Citigroup vs. Toronto Dominion Bank | Citigroup vs. Nu Holdings |
| 06051GKH1 vs. Amgen Inc | 06051GKH1 vs. Everus Construction Group | 06051GKH1 vs. Jacobs Solutions | 06051GKH1 vs. Xponential Fitness |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Volatility Analysis module to get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data.
Other Complementary Tools
| Price Exposure Probability Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets | |
| Performance Analysis Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation | |
| Watchlist Optimization Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm | |
| Global Correlations Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets | |
| Equity Valuation Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data |