Correlation Between Xtrackers California and FT Cboe

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Xtrackers California and FT Cboe at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Xtrackers California and FT Cboe into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Xtrackers California Municipal and FT Cboe Vest, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Xtrackers California and FT Cboe and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Xtrackers California with a short position of FT Cboe. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Xtrackers California and FT Cboe.

Diversification Opportunities for Xtrackers California and FT Cboe

-0.33
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Xtrackers and IGLD is -0.33. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Xtrackers California Municipal and FT Cboe Vest in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on FT Cboe Vest and Xtrackers California is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Xtrackers California Municipal are associated (or correlated) with FT Cboe. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of FT Cboe Vest has no effect on the direction of Xtrackers California i.e., Xtrackers California and FT Cboe go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Xtrackers California and FT Cboe

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Xtrackers California Municipal is expected to under-perform the FT Cboe. But the etf apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Xtrackers California Municipal is 2.22 times less risky than FT Cboe. The etf trades about -0.1 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The FT Cboe Vest is currently generating about 0.3 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,882  in FT Cboe Vest on November 4, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  71.00  from holding FT Cboe Vest or generate 3.77% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy95.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Xtrackers California Municipal  vs.  FT Cboe Vest

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Xtrackers California 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Xtrackers California Municipal has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Xtrackers California is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
FT Cboe Vest 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in FT Cboe Vest are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather sound essential indicators, FT Cboe is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.

Xtrackers California and FT Cboe Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Xtrackers California and FT Cboe

The main advantage of trading using opposite Xtrackers California and FT Cboe positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Xtrackers California position performs unexpectedly, FT Cboe can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in FT Cboe will offset losses from the drop in FT Cboe's long position.
The idea behind Xtrackers California Municipal and FT Cboe Vest pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Efficient Frontier module to plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market..

Other Complementary Tools

Aroon Oscillator
Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios
Sync Your Broker
Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors.
Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges
Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world