Correlation Between VanEck China and SPDR Bloomberg

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both VanEck China and SPDR Bloomberg at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining VanEck China and SPDR Bloomberg into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between VanEck China Bond and SPDR Bloomberg Emerging, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on VanEck China and SPDR Bloomberg and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in VanEck China with a short position of SPDR Bloomberg. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of VanEck China and SPDR Bloomberg.

Diversification Opportunities for VanEck China and SPDR Bloomberg

0.84
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between VanEck and SPDR is 0.84. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding VanEck China Bond and SPDR Bloomberg Emerging in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on SPDR Bloomberg Emerging and VanEck China is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on VanEck China Bond are associated (or correlated) with SPDR Bloomberg. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of SPDR Bloomberg Emerging has no effect on the direction of VanEck China i.e., VanEck China and SPDR Bloomberg go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between VanEck China and SPDR Bloomberg

Given the investment horizon of 90 days VanEck China Bond is expected to generate 0.63 times more return on investment than SPDR Bloomberg. However, VanEck China Bond is 1.59 times less risky than SPDR Bloomberg. It trades about -0.15 of its potential returns per unit of risk. SPDR Bloomberg Emerging is currently generating about -0.1 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,235  in VanEck China Bond on August 27, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (28.00) from holding VanEck China Bond or give up 1.25% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

VanEck China Bond  vs.  SPDR Bloomberg Emerging

 Performance 
       Timeline  
VanEck China Bond 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days VanEck China Bond has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of very healthy basic indicators, VanEck China is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
SPDR Bloomberg Emerging 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days SPDR Bloomberg Emerging has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of rather sound basic indicators, SPDR Bloomberg is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.

VanEck China and SPDR Bloomberg Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with VanEck China and SPDR Bloomberg

The main advantage of trading using opposite VanEck China and SPDR Bloomberg positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if VanEck China position performs unexpectedly, SPDR Bloomberg can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in SPDR Bloomberg will offset losses from the drop in SPDR Bloomberg's long position.
The idea behind VanEck China Bond and SPDR Bloomberg Emerging pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Financial Widgets module to easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Sync Your Broker
Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors.
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals