Correlation Between Cadence Design and Dine Brands

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Cadence Design and Dine Brands at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Cadence Design and Dine Brands into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Cadence Design Systems and Dine Brands Global, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Cadence Design and Dine Brands and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Cadence Design with a short position of Dine Brands. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Cadence Design and Dine Brands.

Diversification Opportunities for Cadence Design and Dine Brands

0.59
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Cadence and Dine is 0.59. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Cadence Design Systems and Dine Brands Global in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Dine Brands Global and Cadence Design is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Cadence Design Systems are associated (or correlated) with Dine Brands. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Dine Brands Global has no effect on the direction of Cadence Design i.e., Cadence Design and Dine Brands go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Cadence Design and Dine Brands

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Cadence Design Systems is expected to generate 0.79 times more return on investment than Dine Brands. However, Cadence Design Systems is 1.26 times less risky than Dine Brands. It trades about 0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Dine Brands Global is currently generating about -0.03 per unit of risk. If you would invest  27,025  in Cadence Design Systems on September 14, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  3,650  from holding Cadence Design Systems or generate 13.51% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Cadence Design Systems  vs.  Dine Brands Global

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Cadence Design Systems 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Cadence Design Systems are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively abnormal basic indicators, Cadence Design unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Dine Brands Global 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Dine Brands Global are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very unfluctuating forward indicators, Dine Brands may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Cadence Design and Dine Brands Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Cadence Design and Dine Brands

The main advantage of trading using opposite Cadence Design and Dine Brands positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Cadence Design position performs unexpectedly, Dine Brands can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Dine Brands will offset losses from the drop in Dine Brands' long position.
The idea behind Cadence Design Systems and Dine Brands Global pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Theme Ratings module to determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings