Correlation Between Cadence Design and KINDER

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Cadence Design and KINDER at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Cadence Design and KINDER into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Cadence Design Systems and KINDER MORGAN ENERGY, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Cadence Design and KINDER and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Cadence Design with a short position of KINDER. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Cadence Design and KINDER.

Diversification Opportunities for Cadence Design and KINDER

-0.59
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Cadence and KINDER is -0.59. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Cadence Design Systems and KINDER MORGAN ENERGY in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on KINDER MORGAN ENERGY and Cadence Design is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Cadence Design Systems are associated (or correlated) with KINDER. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of KINDER MORGAN ENERGY has no effect on the direction of Cadence Design i.e., Cadence Design and KINDER go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Cadence Design and KINDER

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Cadence Design Systems is expected to generate 3.53 times more return on investment than KINDER. However, Cadence Design is 3.53 times more volatile than KINDER MORGAN ENERGY. It trades about 0.13 of its potential returns per unit of risk. KINDER MORGAN ENERGY is currently generating about -0.12 per unit of risk. If you would invest  25,628  in Cadence Design Systems on September 3, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  5,053  from holding Cadence Design Systems or generate 19.72% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy84.38%
ValuesDaily Returns

Cadence Design Systems  vs.  KINDER MORGAN ENERGY

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Cadence Design Systems 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Cadence Design Systems are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively weak basic indicators, Cadence Design unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
KINDER MORGAN ENERGY 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days KINDER MORGAN ENERGY has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, KINDER is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Cadence Design and KINDER Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Cadence Design and KINDER

The main advantage of trading using opposite Cadence Design and KINDER positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Cadence Design position performs unexpectedly, KINDER can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in KINDER will offset losses from the drop in KINDER's long position.
The idea behind Cadence Design Systems and KINDER MORGAN ENERGY pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Economic Indicators module to top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets