Correlation Between Codexis and Spring Valley

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Codexis and Spring Valley at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Codexis and Spring Valley into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Codexis and Spring Valley Acquisition, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Codexis and Spring Valley and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Codexis with a short position of Spring Valley. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Codexis and Spring Valley.

Diversification Opportunities for Codexis and Spring Valley

-0.28
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Codexis and Spring is -0.28. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Codexis and Spring Valley Acquisition in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Spring Valley Acquisition and Codexis is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Codexis are associated (or correlated) with Spring Valley. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Spring Valley Acquisition has no effect on the direction of Codexis i.e., Codexis and Spring Valley go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Codexis and Spring Valley

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Codexis is expected to generate 1.3 times less return on investment than Spring Valley. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Codexis is 2.56 times less risky than Spring Valley. It trades about 0.31 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Spring Valley Acquisition is currently generating about 0.16 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  5.02  in Spring Valley Acquisition on September 13, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  2.08  from holding Spring Valley Acquisition or generate 41.43% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy67.44%
ValuesDaily Returns

Codexis  vs.  Spring Valley Acquisition

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Codexis 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

22 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Codexis are ranked lower than 22 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively weak basic indicators, Codexis unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Spring Valley Acquisition 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Spring Valley Acquisition are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Even with relatively fragile forward indicators, Spring Valley reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Codexis and Spring Valley Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Codexis and Spring Valley

The main advantage of trading using opposite Codexis and Spring Valley positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Codexis position performs unexpectedly, Spring Valley can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Spring Valley will offset losses from the drop in Spring Valley's long position.
The idea behind Codexis and Spring Valley Acquisition pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Holdings module to check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing.

Other Complementary Tools

Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
Top Crypto Exchanges
Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation