Correlation Between Chase Growth and Sierra Core

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Chase Growth and Sierra Core at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Chase Growth and Sierra Core into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Chase Growth Fund and Sierra E Retirement, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Chase Growth and Sierra Core and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Chase Growth with a short position of Sierra Core. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Chase Growth and Sierra Core.

Diversification Opportunities for Chase Growth and Sierra Core

0.66
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Chase and Sierra is 0.66. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Chase Growth Fund and Sierra E Retirement in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Sierra E Retirement and Chase Growth is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Chase Growth Fund are associated (or correlated) with Sierra Core. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Sierra E Retirement has no effect on the direction of Chase Growth i.e., Chase Growth and Sierra Core go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Chase Growth and Sierra Core

Assuming the 90 days horizon Chase Growth Fund is expected to generate 3.92 times more return on investment than Sierra Core. However, Chase Growth is 3.92 times more volatile than Sierra E Retirement. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Sierra E Retirement is currently generating about 0.04 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,070  in Chase Growth Fund on October 13, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  384.00  from holding Chase Growth Fund or generate 35.89% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Chase Growth Fund  vs.  Sierra E Retirement

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Chase Growth 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Chase Growth Fund has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of weak performance in the last few months, the Fund's basic indicators remain fairly strong which may send shares a bit higher in February 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long term up-swing for the fund investors.
Sierra E Retirement 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Sierra E Retirement has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Sierra Core is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Chase Growth and Sierra Core Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Chase Growth and Sierra Core

The main advantage of trading using opposite Chase Growth and Sierra Core positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Chase Growth position performs unexpectedly, Sierra Core can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Sierra Core will offset losses from the drop in Sierra Core's long position.
The idea behind Chase Growth Fund and Sierra E Retirement pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Valuation module to check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data.

Other Complementary Tools

CEOs Directory
Screen CEOs from public companies around the world
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Earnings Calls
Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges