Correlation Between Chestnut Street and Goldman Sachs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Chestnut Street and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Chestnut Street and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Chestnut Street Exchange and Goldman Sachs Tax Advantaged, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Chestnut Street and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Chestnut Street with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Chestnut Street and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Chestnut Street and Goldman Sachs

0.82
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Chestnut and Goldman is 0.82. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Chestnut Street Exchange and Goldman Sachs Tax Advantaged in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs Tax and Chestnut Street is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Chestnut Street Exchange are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs Tax has no effect on the direction of Chestnut Street i.e., Chestnut Street and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Chestnut Street and Goldman Sachs

Assuming the 90 days horizon Chestnut Street is expected to generate 2.86 times less return on investment than Goldman Sachs. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Chestnut Street Exchange is 1.02 times less risky than Goldman Sachs. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Goldman Sachs Tax Advantaged is currently generating about 0.14 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,512  in Goldman Sachs Tax Advantaged on October 20, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  53.00  from holding Goldman Sachs Tax Advantaged or generate 2.11% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Chestnut Street Exchange  vs.  Goldman Sachs Tax Advantaged

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Chestnut Street Exchange 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Chestnut Street Exchange has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Chestnut Street is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Goldman Sachs Tax 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs Tax Advantaged are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Chestnut Street and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Chestnut Street and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Chestnut Street and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Chestnut Street position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.
The idea behind Chestnut Street Exchange and Goldman Sachs Tax Advantaged pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Premium Stories module to follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope.

Other Complementary Tools

Earnings Calls
Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity
Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges
Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance