Correlation Between JPMorgan Chase and China Construction

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both JPMorgan Chase and China Construction at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining JPMorgan Chase and China Construction into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between JPMorgan Chase Co and China Construction Bank, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on JPMorgan Chase and China Construction and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in JPMorgan Chase with a short position of China Construction. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of JPMorgan Chase and China Construction.

Diversification Opportunities for JPMorgan Chase and China Construction

0.5
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between JPMorgan and China is 0.5. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding JPMorgan Chase Co and China Construction Bank in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on China Construction Bank and JPMorgan Chase is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on JPMorgan Chase Co are associated (or correlated) with China Construction. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of China Construction Bank has no effect on the direction of JPMorgan Chase i.e., JPMorgan Chase and China Construction go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between JPMorgan Chase and China Construction

Assuming the 90 days horizon JPMorgan Chase is expected to generate 1.52 times less return on investment than China Construction. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, JPMorgan Chase Co is 2.01 times less risky than China Construction. It trades about 0.13 of its potential returns per unit of risk. China Construction Bank is currently generating about 0.1 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  39.00  in China Construction Bank on October 20, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  36.00  from holding China Construction Bank or generate 92.31% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

JPMorgan Chase Co  vs.  China Construction Bank

 Performance 
       Timeline  
JPMorgan Chase 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in JPMorgan Chase Co are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, JPMorgan Chase reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
China Construction Bank 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in China Construction Bank are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly uncertain basic indicators, China Construction reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

JPMorgan Chase and China Construction Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with JPMorgan Chase and China Construction

The main advantage of trading using opposite JPMorgan Chase and China Construction positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if JPMorgan Chase position performs unexpectedly, China Construction can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in China Construction will offset losses from the drop in China Construction's long position.
The idea behind JPMorgan Chase Co and China Construction Bank pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Cryptocurrency Center module to build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency.

Other Complementary Tools

Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Portfolio Anywhere
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum