Correlation Between Columbus McKinnon and Hyster Yale

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Columbus McKinnon and Hyster Yale at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Columbus McKinnon and Hyster Yale into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Columbus McKinnon and Hyster Yale Materials Handling, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Columbus McKinnon and Hyster Yale and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Columbus McKinnon with a short position of Hyster Yale. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Columbus McKinnon and Hyster Yale.

Diversification Opportunities for Columbus McKinnon and Hyster Yale

-0.26
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Columbus and Hyster is -0.26. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Columbus McKinnon and Hyster Yale Materials Handling in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Hyster Yale Materials and Columbus McKinnon is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Columbus McKinnon are associated (or correlated) with Hyster Yale. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Hyster Yale Materials has no effect on the direction of Columbus McKinnon i.e., Columbus McKinnon and Hyster Yale go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Columbus McKinnon and Hyster Yale

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Columbus McKinnon is expected to under-perform the Hyster Yale. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Columbus McKinnon is 1.62 times less risky than Hyster Yale. The stock trades about -0.01 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Hyster Yale Materials Handling is currently generating about 0.01 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  5,827  in Hyster Yale Materials Handling on August 27, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (148.00) from holding Hyster Yale Materials Handling or give up 2.54% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Columbus McKinnon  vs.  Hyster Yale Materials Handling

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Columbus McKinnon 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Columbus McKinnon are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very uncertain fundamental indicators, Columbus McKinnon displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Hyster Yale Materials 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Hyster Yale Materials Handling has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Hyster Yale is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Columbus McKinnon and Hyster Yale Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Columbus McKinnon and Hyster Yale

The main advantage of trading using opposite Columbus McKinnon and Hyster Yale positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Columbus McKinnon position performs unexpectedly, Hyster Yale can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Hyster Yale will offset losses from the drop in Hyster Yale's long position.
The idea behind Columbus McKinnon and Hyster Yale Materials Handling pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Bollinger Bands module to use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon.

Other Complementary Tools

Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
Portfolio File Import
Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format