Correlation Between Columbus McKinnon and AB Volvo

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Columbus McKinnon and AB Volvo at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Columbus McKinnon and AB Volvo into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Columbus McKinnon and AB Volvo, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Columbus McKinnon and AB Volvo and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Columbus McKinnon with a short position of AB Volvo. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Columbus McKinnon and AB Volvo.

Diversification Opportunities for Columbus McKinnon and AB Volvo

-0.74
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Columbus and VOLAF is -0.74. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Columbus McKinnon and AB Volvo in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on AB Volvo and Columbus McKinnon is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Columbus McKinnon are associated (or correlated) with AB Volvo. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of AB Volvo has no effect on the direction of Columbus McKinnon i.e., Columbus McKinnon and AB Volvo go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Columbus McKinnon and AB Volvo

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Columbus McKinnon is expected to generate 1.97 times less return on investment than AB Volvo. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Columbus McKinnon is 1.05 times less risky than AB Volvo. It trades about 0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. AB Volvo is currently generating about 0.05 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,987  in AB Volvo on August 31, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  589.00  from holding AB Volvo or generate 29.64% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy71.07%
ValuesDaily Returns

Columbus McKinnon  vs.  AB Volvo

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Columbus McKinnon 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Columbus McKinnon are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very unfluctuating fundamental indicators, Columbus McKinnon displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
AB Volvo 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days AB Volvo has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, AB Volvo is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Columbus McKinnon and AB Volvo Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Columbus McKinnon and AB Volvo

The main advantage of trading using opposite Columbus McKinnon and AB Volvo positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Columbus McKinnon position performs unexpectedly, AB Volvo can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in AB Volvo will offset losses from the drop in AB Volvo's long position.
The idea behind Columbus McKinnon and AB Volvo pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Pattern Recognition module to use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges.

Other Complementary Tools

Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios
Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings