Correlation Between CMS Energy and New Fortress

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both CMS Energy and New Fortress at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining CMS Energy and New Fortress into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between CMS Energy and New Fortress Energy, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on CMS Energy and New Fortress and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in CMS Energy with a short position of New Fortress. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of CMS Energy and New Fortress.

Diversification Opportunities for CMS Energy and New Fortress

-0.5
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between CMS and New is -0.5. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding CMS Energy and New Fortress Energy in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on New Fortress Energy and CMS Energy is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on CMS Energy are associated (or correlated) with New Fortress. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of New Fortress Energy has no effect on the direction of CMS Energy i.e., CMS Energy and New Fortress go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between CMS Energy and New Fortress

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon CMS Energy is expected to generate 0.37 times more return on investment than New Fortress. However, CMS Energy is 2.73 times less risky than New Fortress. It trades about 0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. New Fortress Energy is currently generating about -0.06 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,651  in CMS Energy on August 27, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  266.00  from holding CMS Energy or generate 16.11% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

CMS Energy  vs.  New Fortress Energy

 Performance 
       Timeline  
CMS Energy 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in CMS Energy are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather sound basic indicators, CMS Energy is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.
New Fortress Energy 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days New Fortress Energy has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of fragile performance in the last few months, the Stock's technical and fundamental indicators remain rather sound which may send shares a bit higher in December 2024. The latest tumult may also be a sign of longer-term up-swing for the firm shareholders.

CMS Energy and New Fortress Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with CMS Energy and New Fortress

The main advantage of trading using opposite CMS Energy and New Fortress positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if CMS Energy position performs unexpectedly, New Fortress can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in New Fortress will offset losses from the drop in New Fortress' long position.
The idea behind CMS Energy and New Fortress Energy pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Risk-Return Analysis module to view associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume.

Other Complementary Tools

Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments