Correlation Between Conifer Holdings, and Highest Performances
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Conifer Holdings, and Highest Performances at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Conifer Holdings, and Highest Performances into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Conifer Holdings, 975 and Highest Performances Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Conifer Holdings, and Highest Performances and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Conifer Holdings, with a short position of Highest Performances. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Conifer Holdings, and Highest Performances.
Diversification Opportunities for Conifer Holdings, and Highest Performances
-0.3 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very good diversification
The 3 months correlation between Conifer and Highest is -0.3. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Conifer Holdings, 975 and Highest Performances Holdings in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Highest Performances and Conifer Holdings, is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Conifer Holdings, 975 are associated (or correlated) with Highest Performances. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Highest Performances has no effect on the direction of Conifer Holdings, i.e., Conifer Holdings, and Highest Performances go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Conifer Holdings, and Highest Performances
Assuming the 90 days horizon Conifer Holdings, 975 is expected to generate 0.57 times more return on investment than Highest Performances. However, Conifer Holdings, 975 is 1.75 times less risky than Highest Performances. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Highest Performances Holdings is currently generating about 0.03 per unit of risk. If you would invest 2,220 in Conifer Holdings, 975 on October 9, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 80.00 from holding Conifer Holdings, 975 or generate 3.6% return on investment over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Moves Against |
| Strength | Insignificant |
| Accuracy | 89.47% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
Conifer Holdings, 975 vs. Highest Performances Holdings
Performance |
| Timeline |
| Conifer Holdings, 975 |
| Highest Performances |
Conifer Holdings, and Highest Performances Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with Conifer Holdings, and Highest Performances
The main advantage of trading using opposite Conifer Holdings, and Highest Performances positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Conifer Holdings, position performs unexpectedly, Highest Performances can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Highest Performances will offset losses from the drop in Highest Performances' long position.| Conifer Holdings, vs. Loews Corp | Conifer Holdings, vs. Cigna Corp | Conifer Holdings, vs. Everest Group | Conifer Holdings, vs. Globe Life |
| Highest Performances vs. Volaris | Highest Performances vs. Direct Line Insurance | Highest Performances vs. Bowhead Specialty Holdings | Highest Performances vs. Cincinnati Financial |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Theme Ratings module to determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.
Other Complementary Tools
| Equity Analysis Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities | |
| Funds Screener Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges | |
| Efficient Frontier Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market. | |
| Equity Search Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets | |
| Positions Ratings Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance |