Correlation Between Commonwealth Global and Oppenheimer Flexible
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Commonwealth Global and Oppenheimer Flexible at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Commonwealth Global and Oppenheimer Flexible into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Commonwealth Global Fund and Oppenheimer Flexible Strategies, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Commonwealth Global and Oppenheimer Flexible and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Commonwealth Global with a short position of Oppenheimer Flexible. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Commonwealth Global and Oppenheimer Flexible.
Diversification Opportunities for Commonwealth Global and Oppenheimer Flexible
0.6 | Correlation Coefficient |
Poor diversification
The 3 months correlation between Commonwealth and Oppenheimer is 0.6. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Commonwealth Global Fund and Oppenheimer Flexible Strategie in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Oppenheimer Flexible and Commonwealth Global is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Commonwealth Global Fund are associated (or correlated) with Oppenheimer Flexible. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Oppenheimer Flexible has no effect on the direction of Commonwealth Global i.e., Commonwealth Global and Oppenheimer Flexible go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Commonwealth Global and Oppenheimer Flexible
Assuming the 90 days horizon Commonwealth Global Fund is expected to generate 2.89 times more return on investment than Oppenheimer Flexible. However, Commonwealth Global is 2.89 times more volatile than Oppenheimer Flexible Strategies. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Oppenheimer Flexible Strategies is currently generating about 0.03 per unit of risk. If you would invest 1,805 in Commonwealth Global Fund on September 3, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 367.00 from holding Commonwealth Global Fund or generate 20.33% return on investment over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Moves Together |
| Strength | Significant |
| Accuracy | 100.0% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
Commonwealth Global Fund vs. Oppenheimer Flexible Strategie
Performance |
| Timeline |
| Commonwealth Global |
| Oppenheimer Flexible |
Commonwealth Global and Oppenheimer Flexible Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with Commonwealth Global and Oppenheimer Flexible
The main advantage of trading using opposite Commonwealth Global and Oppenheimer Flexible positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Commonwealth Global position performs unexpectedly, Oppenheimer Flexible can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Oppenheimer Flexible will offset losses from the drop in Oppenheimer Flexible's long position.The idea behind Commonwealth Global Fund and Oppenheimer Flexible Strategies pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
| Oppenheimer Flexible vs. Gmo Resources | Oppenheimer Flexible vs. Goehring Rozencwajg Resources | Oppenheimer Flexible vs. Jennison Natural Resources | Oppenheimer Flexible vs. Hennessy Bp Energy |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Performance Analysis module to check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation.
Other Complementary Tools
| Positions Ratings Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
| AI Portfolio Architect Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities | |
| Global Markets Map Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes | |
| Companies Directory Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals | |
| Portfolio Backtesting Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios |