Correlation Between Connecticut Light and Bank of AmericaPFD SER B

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Connecticut Light and Bank of AmericaPFD SER B at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Connecticut Light and Bank of AmericaPFD SER B into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between The Connecticut Light and Bank of America, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Connecticut Light and Bank of AmericaPFD SER B and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Connecticut Light with a short position of Bank of AmericaPFD SER B . Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Connecticut Light and Bank of AmericaPFD SER B .

Diversification Opportunities for Connecticut Light and Bank of AmericaPFD SER B

-0.39
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Connecticut and Bank is -0.39. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding The Connecticut Light and Bank of America in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Bank of AmericaPFD SER B and Connecticut Light is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on The Connecticut Light are associated (or correlated) with Bank of AmericaPFD SER B . Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Bank of AmericaPFD SER B has no effect on the direction of Connecticut Light i.e., Connecticut Light and Bank of AmericaPFD SER B go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Connecticut Light and Bank of AmericaPFD SER B

Assuming the 90 days horizon The Connecticut Light is expected to under-perform the Bank of AmericaPFD SER B . But the pink sheet apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, The Connecticut Light is 1.13 times less risky than Bank of AmericaPFD SER B . The pink sheet trades about -0.35 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Bank of America is currently generating about -0.21 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  19,975  in Bank of America on August 29, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (975.00) from holding Bank of America or give up 4.88% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

The Connecticut Light  vs.  Bank of America

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Connecticut Light 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days The Connecticut Light has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of very healthy basic indicators, Connecticut Light is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Bank of AmericaPFD SER B  

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bank of America are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Even with relatively invariable basic indicators, Bank of AmericaPFD SER B is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price agitation, may contribute to short-term losses for the retail investors.

Connecticut Light and Bank of AmericaPFD SER B Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Connecticut Light and Bank of AmericaPFD SER B

The main advantage of trading using opposite Connecticut Light and Bank of AmericaPFD SER B positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Connecticut Light position performs unexpectedly, Bank of AmericaPFD SER B can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Bank of AmericaPFD SER B will offset losses from the drop in Bank of AmericaPFD SER B 's long position.
The idea behind The Connecticut Light and Bank of America pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Funds Screener module to find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals