Correlation Between GraniteShares Bloomberg and DoubleLine ETF

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GraniteShares Bloomberg and DoubleLine ETF at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GraniteShares Bloomberg and DoubleLine ETF into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity and DoubleLine ETF Trust, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GraniteShares Bloomberg and DoubleLine ETF and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GraniteShares Bloomberg with a short position of DoubleLine ETF. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GraniteShares Bloomberg and DoubleLine ETF.

Diversification Opportunities for GraniteShares Bloomberg and DoubleLine ETF

0.93
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between GraniteShares and DoubleLine is 0.93. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding GraniteShares Bloomberg Commod and DoubleLine ETF Trust in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on DoubleLine ETF Trust and GraniteShares Bloomberg is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity are associated (or correlated) with DoubleLine ETF. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of DoubleLine ETF Trust has no effect on the direction of GraniteShares Bloomberg i.e., GraniteShares Bloomberg and DoubleLine ETF go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GraniteShares Bloomberg and DoubleLine ETF

Given the investment horizon of 90 days GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity is expected to generate 0.97 times more return on investment than DoubleLine ETF. However, GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity is 1.04 times less risky than DoubleLine ETF. It trades about 0.4 of its potential returns per unit of risk. DoubleLine ETF Trust is currently generating about 0.31 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,978  in GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity on October 25, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  115.00  from holding GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity or generate 5.81% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

GraniteShares Bloomberg Commod  vs.  DoubleLine ETF Trust

 Performance 
       Timeline  
GraniteShares Bloomberg 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat strong primary indicators, GraniteShares Bloomberg is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
DoubleLine ETF Trust 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in DoubleLine ETF Trust are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable primary indicators, DoubleLine ETF is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

GraniteShares Bloomberg and DoubleLine ETF Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GraniteShares Bloomberg and DoubleLine ETF

The main advantage of trading using opposite GraniteShares Bloomberg and DoubleLine ETF positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GraniteShares Bloomberg position performs unexpectedly, DoubleLine ETF can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in DoubleLine ETF will offset losses from the drop in DoubleLine ETF's long position.
The idea behind GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity and DoubleLine ETF Trust pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Correlation Analysis module to reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing