Correlation Between California Resources and Texas Pacific

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both California Resources and Texas Pacific at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining California Resources and Texas Pacific into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between California Resources Corp and Texas Pacific Land, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on California Resources and Texas Pacific and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in California Resources with a short position of Texas Pacific. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of California Resources and Texas Pacific.

Diversification Opportunities for California Resources and Texas Pacific

0.44
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between California and Texas is 0.44. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding California Resources Corp and Texas Pacific Land in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Texas Pacific Land and California Resources is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on California Resources Corp are associated (or correlated) with Texas Pacific. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Texas Pacific Land has no effect on the direction of California Resources i.e., California Resources and Texas Pacific go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between California Resources and Texas Pacific

Considering the 90-day investment horizon California Resources Corp is expected to under-perform the Texas Pacific. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, California Resources Corp is 1.24 times less risky than Texas Pacific. The stock trades about -0.26 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Texas Pacific Land is currently generating about 0.14 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  125,572  in Texas Pacific Land on November 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  9,575  from holding Texas Pacific Land or generate 7.63% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

California Resources Corp  vs.  Texas Pacific Land

 Performance 
       Timeline  
California Resources Corp 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days California Resources Corp has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of weak performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain rather sound which may send shares a bit higher in March 2025. The latest tumult may also be a sign of longer-term up-swing for the firm shareholders.
Texas Pacific Land 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Texas Pacific Land has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite weak performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain quite persistent which may send shares a bit higher in March 2025. The latest mess may also be a sign of long-standing up-swing for the company institutional investors.

California Resources and Texas Pacific Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with California Resources and Texas Pacific

The main advantage of trading using opposite California Resources and Texas Pacific positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if California Resources position performs unexpectedly, Texas Pacific can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Texas Pacific will offset losses from the drop in Texas Pacific's long position.
The idea behind California Resources Corp and Texas Pacific Land pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Breakdown module to analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes.

Other Complementary Tools

Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance