Correlation Between Cisco Systems and Chesapeake Energy

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Cisco Systems and Chesapeake Energy at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Cisco Systems and Chesapeake Energy into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Cisco Systems and Chesapeake Energy, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Cisco Systems and Chesapeake Energy and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Cisco Systems with a short position of Chesapeake Energy. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Cisco Systems and Chesapeake Energy.

Diversification Opportunities for Cisco Systems and Chesapeake Energy

-0.43
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Cisco and Chesapeake is -0.43. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Cisco Systems and Chesapeake Energy in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Chesapeake Energy and Cisco Systems is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Cisco Systems are associated (or correlated) with Chesapeake Energy. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Chesapeake Energy has no effect on the direction of Cisco Systems i.e., Cisco Systems and Chesapeake Energy go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Cisco Systems and Chesapeake Energy

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Cisco Systems is expected to generate 298.86 times less return on investment than Chesapeake Energy. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Cisco Systems is 116.41 times less risky than Chesapeake Energy. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Chesapeake Energy is currently generating about 0.13 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  8,938  in Chesapeake Energy on August 30, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (1,749) from holding Chesapeake Energy or give up 19.57% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy50.1%
ValuesDaily Returns

Cisco Systems  vs.  Chesapeake Energy

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Cisco Systems 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

20 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Cisco Systems are ranked lower than 20 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak fundamental indicators, Cisco Systems displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Chesapeake Energy 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Excellent
Over the last 90 days Chesapeake Energy has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of fairly weak technical and fundamental indicators, Chesapeake Energy showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Cisco Systems and Chesapeake Energy Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Cisco Systems and Chesapeake Energy

The main advantage of trading using opposite Cisco Systems and Chesapeake Energy positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Cisco Systems position performs unexpectedly, Chesapeake Energy can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Chesapeake Energy will offset losses from the drop in Chesapeake Energy's long position.
The idea behind Cisco Systems and Chesapeake Energy pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Premium Stories module to follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope.

Other Complementary Tools

Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity
Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world