Correlation Between Cisco Systems and Frontera Energy

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Cisco Systems and Frontera Energy at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Cisco Systems and Frontera Energy into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Cisco Systems and Frontera Energy Corp, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Cisco Systems and Frontera Energy and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Cisco Systems with a short position of Frontera Energy. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Cisco Systems and Frontera Energy.

Diversification Opportunities for Cisco Systems and Frontera Energy

-0.39
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Cisco and Frontera is -0.39. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Cisco Systems and Frontera Energy Corp in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Frontera Energy Corp and Cisco Systems is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Cisco Systems are associated (or correlated) with Frontera Energy. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Frontera Energy Corp has no effect on the direction of Cisco Systems i.e., Cisco Systems and Frontera Energy go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Cisco Systems and Frontera Energy

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Cisco Systems is expected to generate 0.45 times more return on investment than Frontera Energy. However, Cisco Systems is 2.2 times less risky than Frontera Energy. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Frontera Energy Corp is currently generating about -0.01 per unit of risk. If you would invest  4,554  in Cisco Systems on August 30, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,375  from holding Cisco Systems or generate 30.19% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Cisco Systems  vs.  Frontera Energy Corp

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Cisco Systems 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

20 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Cisco Systems are ranked lower than 20 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak fundamental indicators, Cisco Systems displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Frontera Energy Corp 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Frontera Energy Corp has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable fundamental indicators, Frontera Energy is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Cisco Systems and Frontera Energy Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Cisco Systems and Frontera Energy

The main advantage of trading using opposite Cisco Systems and Frontera Energy positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Cisco Systems position performs unexpectedly, Frontera Energy can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Frontera Energy will offset losses from the drop in Frontera Energy's long position.
The idea behind Cisco Systems and Frontera Energy Corp pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Share Portfolio module to track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device.

Other Complementary Tools

Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Cryptocurrency Center
Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency