Correlation Between Cisco Systems and Journey Energy

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Cisco Systems and Journey Energy at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Cisco Systems and Journey Energy into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Cisco Systems and Journey Energy, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Cisco Systems and Journey Energy and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Cisco Systems with a short position of Journey Energy. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Cisco Systems and Journey Energy.

Diversification Opportunities for Cisco Systems and Journey Energy

-0.59
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Cisco and Journey is -0.59. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Cisco Systems and Journey Energy in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Journey Energy and Cisco Systems is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Cisco Systems are associated (or correlated) with Journey Energy. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Journey Energy has no effect on the direction of Cisco Systems i.e., Cisco Systems and Journey Energy go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Cisco Systems and Journey Energy

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Cisco Systems is expected to generate 0.41 times more return on investment than Journey Energy. However, Cisco Systems is 2.45 times less risky than Journey Energy. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Journey Energy is currently generating about -0.05 per unit of risk. If you would invest  4,603  in Cisco Systems on August 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,306  from holding Cisco Systems or generate 28.36% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Cisco Systems  vs.  Journey Energy

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Cisco Systems 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

21 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Cisco Systems are ranked lower than 21 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak fundamental indicators, Cisco Systems displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Journey Energy 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Journey Energy has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite fragile performance in the last few months, the Stock's technical and fundamental indicators remain nearly stable which may send shares a bit higher in December 2024. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long-run up-swing for the company stockholders.

Cisco Systems and Journey Energy Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Cisco Systems and Journey Energy

The main advantage of trading using opposite Cisco Systems and Journey Energy positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Cisco Systems position performs unexpectedly, Journey Energy can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Journey Energy will offset losses from the drop in Journey Energy's long position.
The idea behind Cisco Systems and Journey Energy pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Alpha Finder module to use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals