Correlation Between CMS Energy and CK Infrastructure

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both CMS Energy and CK Infrastructure at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining CMS Energy and CK Infrastructure into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between CMS Energy and CK Infrastructure Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on CMS Energy and CK Infrastructure and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in CMS Energy with a short position of CK Infrastructure. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of CMS Energy and CK Infrastructure.

Diversification Opportunities for CMS Energy and CK Infrastructure

0.31
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between CMS and CHH is 0.31. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding CMS Energy and CK Infrastructure Holdings in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on CK Infrastructure and CMS Energy is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on CMS Energy are associated (or correlated) with CK Infrastructure. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of CK Infrastructure has no effect on the direction of CMS Energy i.e., CMS Energy and CK Infrastructure go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between CMS Energy and CK Infrastructure

Assuming the 90 days horizon CMS Energy is expected to generate 0.47 times more return on investment than CK Infrastructure. However, CMS Energy is 2.11 times less risky than CK Infrastructure. It trades about 0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. CK Infrastructure Holdings is currently generating about 0.02 per unit of risk. If you would invest  6,200  in CMS Energy on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  200.00  from holding CMS Energy or generate 3.23% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

CMS Energy  vs.  CK Infrastructure Holdings

 Performance 
       Timeline  
CMS Energy 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in CMS Energy are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, CMS Energy is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
CK Infrastructure 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in CK Infrastructure Holdings are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, CK Infrastructure is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

CMS Energy and CK Infrastructure Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with CMS Energy and CK Infrastructure

The main advantage of trading using opposite CMS Energy and CK Infrastructure positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if CMS Energy position performs unexpectedly, CK Infrastructure can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in CK Infrastructure will offset losses from the drop in CK Infrastructure's long position.
The idea behind CMS Energy and CK Infrastructure Holdings pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Crypto Correlations module to use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins.

Other Complementary Tools

Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Aroon Oscillator
Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios
Crypto Correlations
Use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins