Correlation Between Computer Task and Grid Dynamics

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Computer Task and Grid Dynamics at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Computer Task and Grid Dynamics into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Computer Task Group and Grid Dynamics Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Computer Task and Grid Dynamics and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Computer Task with a short position of Grid Dynamics. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Computer Task and Grid Dynamics.

Diversification Opportunities for Computer Task and Grid Dynamics

0.77
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Computer and Grid is 0.77. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Computer Task Group and Grid Dynamics Holdings in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Grid Dynamics Holdings and Computer Task is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Computer Task Group are associated (or correlated) with Grid Dynamics. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Grid Dynamics Holdings has no effect on the direction of Computer Task i.e., Computer Task and Grid Dynamics go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Computer Task and Grid Dynamics

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Computer Task is expected to generate 2.56 times less return on investment than Grid Dynamics. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Computer Task Group is 1.36 times less risky than Grid Dynamics. It trades about 0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Grid Dynamics Holdings is currently generating about 0.05 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,143  in Grid Dynamics Holdings on August 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  747.00  from holding Grid Dynamics Holdings or generate 65.35% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy31.52%
ValuesDaily Returns

Computer Task Group  vs.  Grid Dynamics Holdings

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Computer Task Group 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Computer Task Group has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Computer Task is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
Grid Dynamics Holdings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

16 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Grid Dynamics Holdings are ranked lower than 16 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak basic indicators, Grid Dynamics displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Computer Task and Grid Dynamics Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Computer Task and Grid Dynamics

The main advantage of trading using opposite Computer Task and Grid Dynamics positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Computer Task position performs unexpectedly, Grid Dynamics can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Grid Dynamics will offset losses from the drop in Grid Dynamics' long position.
The idea behind Computer Task Group and Grid Dynamics Holdings pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the CEOs Directory module to screen CEOs from public companies around the world.

Other Complementary Tools

Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences
Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA
Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories