Correlation Between City Union and Max Healthcare

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both City Union and Max Healthcare at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining City Union and Max Healthcare into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between City Union Bank and Max Healthcare Institute, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on City Union and Max Healthcare and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in City Union with a short position of Max Healthcare. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of City Union and Max Healthcare.

Diversification Opportunities for City Union and Max Healthcare

0.14
  Correlation Coefficient

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between City and Max is 0.14. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding City Union Bank and Max Healthcare Institute in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Max Healthcare Institute and City Union is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on City Union Bank are associated (or correlated) with Max Healthcare. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Max Healthcare Institute has no effect on the direction of City Union i.e., City Union and Max Healthcare go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between City Union and Max Healthcare

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon City Union Bank is expected to under-perform the Max Healthcare. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, City Union Bank is 1.71 times less risky than Max Healthcare. The stock trades about -0.15 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Max Healthcare Institute is currently generating about 0.06 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  97,975  in Max Healthcare Institute on October 30, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  5,020  from holding Max Healthcare Institute or generate 5.12% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy97.56%
ValuesDaily Returns

City Union Bank  vs.  Max Healthcare Institute

 Performance 
       Timeline  
City Union Bank 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days City Union Bank has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of rather sound technical and fundamental indicators, City Union is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.
Max Healthcare Institute 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Max Healthcare Institute are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite quite persistent essential indicators, Max Healthcare is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price mess, may contribute to short-term losses for the institutional investors.

City Union and Max Healthcare Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with City Union and Max Healthcare

The main advantage of trading using opposite City Union and Max Healthcare positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if City Union position performs unexpectedly, Max Healthcare can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Max Healthcare will offset losses from the drop in Max Healthcare's long position.
The idea behind City Union Bank and Max Healthcare Institute pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Exposure Probability module to analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio
Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals