Correlation Between Designer Brands and Alliance Entertainment

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Designer Brands and Alliance Entertainment at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Designer Brands and Alliance Entertainment into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Designer Brands and Alliance Entertainment Holding, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Designer Brands and Alliance Entertainment and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Designer Brands with a short position of Alliance Entertainment. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Designer Brands and Alliance Entertainment.

Diversification Opportunities for Designer Brands and Alliance Entertainment

-0.71
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Designer and Alliance is -0.71. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Designer Brands and Alliance Entertainment Holding in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Alliance Entertainment and Designer Brands is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Designer Brands are associated (or correlated) with Alliance Entertainment. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Alliance Entertainment has no effect on the direction of Designer Brands i.e., Designer Brands and Alliance Entertainment go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Designer Brands and Alliance Entertainment

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Designer Brands is expected to generate 51.88 times less return on investment than Alliance Entertainment. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Designer Brands is 3.0 times less risky than Alliance Entertainment. It trades about 0.01 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Alliance Entertainment Holding is currently generating about 0.23 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  328.00  in Alliance Entertainment Holding on August 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  155.00  from holding Alliance Entertainment Holding or generate 47.26% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy95.45%
ValuesDaily Returns

Designer Brands  vs.  Alliance Entertainment Holding

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Designer Brands 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Designer Brands has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite abnormal performance in the last few months, the Stock's fundamental drivers remain fairly strong which may send shares a bit higher in December 2024. The recent confusion may also be a sign of long-lasting up-swing for the firm traders.
Alliance Entertainment 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

19 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Alliance Entertainment Holding are ranked lower than 19 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively inconsistent basic indicators, Alliance Entertainment unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Designer Brands and Alliance Entertainment Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Designer Brands and Alliance Entertainment

The main advantage of trading using opposite Designer Brands and Alliance Entertainment positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Designer Brands position performs unexpectedly, Alliance Entertainment can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Alliance Entertainment will offset losses from the drop in Alliance Entertainment's long position.
The idea behind Designer Brands and Alliance Entertainment Holding pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Dashboard module to portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments.

Other Complementary Tools

Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities