Correlation Between Designer Brands and Crocs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Designer Brands and Crocs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Designer Brands and Crocs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Designer Brands and Crocs Inc, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Designer Brands and Crocs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Designer Brands with a short position of Crocs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Designer Brands and Crocs.

Diversification Opportunities for Designer Brands and Crocs

0.84
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Designer and Crocs is 0.84. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Designer Brands and Crocs Inc in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Crocs Inc and Designer Brands is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Designer Brands are associated (or correlated) with Crocs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Crocs Inc has no effect on the direction of Designer Brands i.e., Designer Brands and Crocs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Designer Brands and Crocs

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Designer Brands is expected to generate 0.6 times more return on investment than Crocs. However, Designer Brands is 1.66 times less risky than Crocs. It trades about -0.15 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Crocs Inc is currently generating about -0.25 per unit of risk. If you would invest  553.00  in Designer Brands on August 27, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (49.00) from holding Designer Brands or give up 8.86% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Designer Brands  vs.  Crocs Inc

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Designer Brands 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Designer Brands has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite abnormal performance in the last few months, the Stock's fundamental drivers remain fairly strong which may send shares a bit higher in December 2024. The recent confusion may also be a sign of long-lasting up-swing for the firm traders.
Crocs Inc 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Crocs Inc has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of unfluctuating performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain fairly strong which may send shares a bit higher in December 2024. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long term up-swing for the company investors.

Designer Brands and Crocs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Designer Brands and Crocs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Designer Brands and Crocs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Designer Brands position performs unexpectedly, Crocs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Crocs will offset losses from the drop in Crocs' long position.
The idea behind Designer Brands and Crocs Inc pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Transaction History module to view history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules