Correlation Between Dine Brands and Stoneridge

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Dine Brands and Stoneridge at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Dine Brands and Stoneridge into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Dine Brands Global and Stoneridge, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Dine Brands and Stoneridge and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Dine Brands with a short position of Stoneridge. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Dine Brands and Stoneridge.

Diversification Opportunities for Dine Brands and Stoneridge

0.75
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Dine and Stoneridge is 0.75. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Dine Brands Global and Stoneridge in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Stoneridge and Dine Brands is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Dine Brands Global are associated (or correlated) with Stoneridge. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Stoneridge has no effect on the direction of Dine Brands i.e., Dine Brands and Stoneridge go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Dine Brands and Stoneridge

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Dine Brands Global is expected to generate 0.63 times more return on investment than Stoneridge. However, Dine Brands Global is 1.59 times less risky than Stoneridge. It trades about -0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Stoneridge is currently generating about -0.29 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,664  in Dine Brands Global on November 18, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (67.00) from holding Dine Brands Global or give up 2.52% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Dine Brands Global  vs.  Stoneridge

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Dine Brands Global 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Dine Brands Global has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of unfluctuating performance in the last few months, the Stock's forward indicators remain very healthy which may send shares a bit higher in March 2025. The recent disarray may also be a sign of long period up-swing for the firm investors.
Stoneridge 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Stoneridge has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite unfluctuating performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain fairly strong which may send shares a bit higher in March 2025. The recent confusion may also be a sign of long-lasting up-swing for the firm traders.

Dine Brands and Stoneridge Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Dine Brands and Stoneridge

The main advantage of trading using opposite Dine Brands and Stoneridge positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Dine Brands position performs unexpectedly, Stoneridge can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Stoneridge will offset losses from the drop in Stoneridge's long position.
The idea behind Dine Brands Global and Stoneridge pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Stock Screener module to find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook..

Other Complementary Tools

Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine
Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios