Correlation Between Diamond Estates and Berkshire Hathaway

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Diamond Estates and Berkshire Hathaway at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Diamond Estates and Berkshire Hathaway into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Diamond Estates Wines and Berkshire Hathaway CDR, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Diamond Estates and Berkshire Hathaway and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Diamond Estates with a short position of Berkshire Hathaway. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Diamond Estates and Berkshire Hathaway.

Diversification Opportunities for Diamond Estates and Berkshire Hathaway

-0.61
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Diamond and Berkshire is -0.61. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Diamond Estates Wines and Berkshire Hathaway CDR in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Berkshire Hathaway CDR and Diamond Estates is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Diamond Estates Wines are associated (or correlated) with Berkshire Hathaway. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Berkshire Hathaway CDR has no effect on the direction of Diamond Estates i.e., Diamond Estates and Berkshire Hathaway go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Diamond Estates and Berkshire Hathaway

Assuming the 90 days horizon Diamond Estates Wines is expected to under-perform the Berkshire Hathaway. In addition to that, Diamond Estates is 5.97 times more volatile than Berkshire Hathaway CDR. It trades about -0.01 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Berkshire Hathaway CDR is currently generating about 0.09 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  2,368  in Berkshire Hathaway CDR on September 13, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,115  from holding Berkshire Hathaway CDR or generate 47.09% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Diamond Estates Wines  vs.  Berkshire Hathaway CDR

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Diamond Estates Wines 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Diamond Estates Wines has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of abnormal performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain fairly stable which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The latest fuss may also be a sign of long-term up-swing for the venture sophisticated investors.
Berkshire Hathaway CDR 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Berkshire Hathaway CDR are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy basic indicators, Berkshire Hathaway is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Diamond Estates and Berkshire Hathaway Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Diamond Estates and Berkshire Hathaway

The main advantage of trading using opposite Diamond Estates and Berkshire Hathaway positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Diamond Estates position performs unexpectedly, Berkshire Hathaway can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Berkshire Hathaway will offset losses from the drop in Berkshire Hathaway's long position.
The idea behind Diamond Estates Wines and Berkshire Hathaway CDR pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Bonds Directory module to find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies.

Other Complementary Tools

Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes
Earnings Calls
Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges
Stock Tickers
Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world